Lawsuits involve a lot more than what you see on TV courtroom dramas. Before trial, lawyers engage in an extensive evidence-gathering process called discovery. This pre-trial phase allows both sides to obtain the information they need to evaluate the case and build their legal strategies. Discovery is not always a smooth process between adversaries, but it’s a critical foundation for fair resolution of civil disputes. Let’s break down how attorneys conduct discovery and why it’s so important.
Think of discovery as a quest for the facts. It’s a chance for the lawyers to dig up evidence and piece together the events leading to the lawsuit.Of course, they’ve already done some legwork before filing a complaint. But formal discovery requires sharing information beyond what the attorneys uncovered themselves. It forces both sides to put their cards on the table.
This evidence swap aims to avoid courtroom surprises. Nobody wants to ambushed by a key document or witness they didn’t know about until trial. Discovery gives the parties a clearer picture of the strengths and weaknesses in each other’s case.
Sure, it’s a pain handing helpful information to the enemy. But discovery works both ways – you get insights into their hand too. And you might uncover some facts that change the entire trajectory of the case. The truth can hurt…or it can set you free. Discovery reveals it either way.
Attorneys have a number of tricks up their sleeves to extract evidence during discovery:
Written questions (interrogatories): One side serves these Q&A’s on the other party seeking info to support their claims or defenses. The idea is to pin down facts, evidence sources, and legal arguments early on.
Oral interviews (depositions): These under-oath question-and-answer sessions allow in-depth probing of parties and witnesses on the major issues. Skilled attorneys gain insights and admissions to aid their case.
Hand over the documents: Requests for production obtain key records, files, communications, and tangible items from the other side. These documents often make or break cases. Subpoenas may be needed to get materials from third parties.
Verify the obvious (requests for admission): These seek binding confirmations of basic undisputed facts. It weeds out what needs to be proven at trial vs. what both sides acknowledge as truth.
Physical/mental exams: For injuries lawsuits, the court may order independent expert medical evaluations of the plaintiff. This allows the defense to assess claims of harm.
Like a detective, attorneys piece together facts from these discovery procedures. It builds the most complete and compelling story possible to explain disputed events.
There’s no swift end to discovery. As new information emerges, it often spurs additional rounds of follow up demands for clarification or elaboration. But some typical phases unfold:
Initial disclosures: Both sides first lay their cards on the table by identifying central witnesses, documents, evidence, and legal arguments they plan to use. This gives a broad sketch of the key facts and disputes.
Drilling down: Next, attorneys probe with targeted questions, document requests, and depositions aimed at fleshing out unclear or suspicious claims from initial disclosures. The devil is in the details.
Dueling experts: Complex cases involve retaining experts to analyze technical issues like standard of care, economic damages, accounting matters, and forensic evidence. Depositions allow scrutiny of competing experts.
Dotting i’s and crossing t’s: As discovery nears its end, the focus shifts to nailing down admissions, documents, and final key witnesses. This shores up the strongest arguments headed into settlement talks or trial preparation.
But discovery schedules rarely go smoothly. Let’s talk obstacles…
Gamesmanship and stonewall tactics plague discovery. After all, each side wants to reveal as little damaging material as possible. Common problems include:
Dodging the tough questions: Evasive or incomplete discovery responses conceal the juicy facts lawyers are digging for. This forces delays from motions disputing compliance.
Buried in paperwork: Overly broad document demands cost massive time/money to produce negligible information. It bogs down cases rather than moving them forward.
Failure to communicate: Withholding or delayed discovery responses breeds repeated squabbles needing court intervention. Lack of cooperation benefits neither party.
Mission overload: Huge cases with extensive discovery demands lead to subpoena and response fatigue. But courts keep the process moving along.
Chasing rainbows: Needle-in-a-haystack problems arise when electronic discovery yields mostly irrelevant materials. It takes technical savvy to target key data.
Hardball tactics: Some attorneys abuse the process by deliberately overloading demands to financially cripple the other side. But judges can curb bullying that gets out of hand.
It’s rarely smooth sailing – disputes and objections go with the territory. But the ship usually stays the course thanks to rules keeping discovery reasonably on track.
For all its headaches, discovery ultimately powers informed settlements and effective trial preparation. How? By supplying attorneys the building blocks to construct the strongest case, such as:
Admissions locking in helpful facts
Documents proving pivotal events
Testimony of key witnesses
Background research on parties and jurors
Expert opinions supporting claims of wrongdoing
Assessment of legal risks/options
Discovery provides raw intel for attorneys to strategize, sharpen arguments, and spotlight opponent weaknesses. You exit the process armed with your best pitch to either a judge or jury.
The quest for facts rarely proceeds smoothly. But determined attorneys can gain crucial insights and evidence for just outcomes through discovery persistence. Despite twists and turns, the truth finds a way into the light.
So while discovery seems dull on the surface, it’s where cases get won or lost. Don’t believe the Hollywood hype – digging for facts is where legal dramas really unfold.
© 2022 Wimgo, Inc. | All rights reserved.